Early Britons – early, ancient or advanced?

New discoveries and a BBC documentary are showing how advanced the early Britons were.

The early Britons are said to be the hunter gatherer types who lived in Briton after the last ice age.

Where they in Briton before that?

Was there an ice age that covered the whole or most of Briton?

The early Britons, if they came over the see via Doggerland, show how advanced these people were. Or how old they were?

the stone-age settlers of ancient Britain were thought of as simple folk, living a brutal hand-to-mouth existence.

But now, evidence is emerging that turns those assumptions upside down. Archaeological sites all over the UK and northern Europe are producing evidence that paints these people in a very different light.

Thanks to this cutting edge science, we now have an increasingly clear picture of prehistory, and the adaptable, culturally rich, and sophisticated people who inhabited these islands.
Early Britons: Have we underestimated our ancestors?

Again modern theory is shown to be totally incorrect. So why should we trust what they think about the ice age, how old man is, the correct version of history and dating, how dumb our ancestors were, etc?

Why should we trust their new theories? Or especially any current theories about old stuff and people?

Early Stonehenge

The results also show how important the Stonehenge area was and how long it has been occupied. It also shows mass gatherings and migrations of people to Stonehenge area for certain festivals over a very long period.

Taken together, the flint and other stone tool evidence suggest that Blick Mead was a feasting and gathering place for thousands of years that people travelled large distances to reach. Far from it being a place nomads dropped into once in a while, time would have been spent there, ideas exchanged and new technologies discussed and adapted.
Early Britons: Have we underestimated our ancestors?